I liked the first Discworld novel quite a bit, but this second book is much better. Where the first book meandered around without much of a overarching plot, this book keeps moving from the very start to a determined conclusion. The first book served its purpose familiarizing us with the world and some characters, and this book is the first real story.
Oh, and I love the humor.
I can’t get over the fact that the most interesting characters are Death and a very determined piece of luggage.
I give this book a 4, and that is because I’m trying really hard to stick to my personal rating system.
Comments
My personal rating system for books, or rather my explanation of the stars I give books over on LibraryThing, is a 1 to 5 scale. Now LibraryThing lets you give half stars, which for me should be read as I was really tempted to go one direction or the other. That and if I only give something a .5 it means a special kind of disgust.
Let’s start with the good!
3 is a book that I enjoyed, but probably will never read again. All in all a meh.
4 is a good read, might read again someday, and generally liked a lot. Most stuff I read should fall into this category, I would imagine.
5 is supposed to be for outstanding books (like the first Harry Potter). That being said I really like giving 5s to books I enjoyed, and I’ll probably bump many 4s to a 4.5 just because I can’t control myself.
Oh, on the low end of the scale…
2 is a book that I got through but didn’t particularly like or took issue with.
1 and lower (if .5 and 0 are considered options) are for books I couldn’t stand to finish, were just horribly bad, or I would consider torture to have to read again.
I’ve given one book so far a .5, but I may have been a tad harsh… I’ve only scratched the surface of hard sci-fi and frankly I don’t think I had got it about that genre when I read that poor book. That being said I didn’t like it.
Comments
